Categorized | Arsenal, Opinion

Nobody Wins The Blame Game

By now, I’m sure that you’ll have seen the furore that has arisen as a result of Alan Davies’ comments on Liverpool’s refusal to play on the anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster. And while the matter itself is very complex, the way that it’s been dealt with by fans and the media alike is so utterly frustrating that it deserves further insight. But first…… *goes to fetch nuclear grade tin hat*

I listen to Davies’ podcast every week. I am a fan of his work. But it’s always important to note that he is a professional comedian and his whole way of life is based on provoking a response from a crowd. So to hear him be as outspoken on such a topic is unsurprising, as it’s how he speaks in public. Could he have phrased his comments differently? Perhaps. Hindsight is 20/20, and we’ve all said things in the heat of the moment that we instantly regret.

But here’s where I have a problem with the reaction to his outburst; what he said had NOTHING to do with Hillsborough. In fact, the only time he refers to what happened on that fateful day, is when he calls it ” the worst event in modern peacetime history”. Not exactly the stuff of scandal, that. No, it’s his criticism of Liverpool’s refusal to play on the anniversary of Hilllsborough that has provoked the masses on Merseyside to aim their ire at him.

Now, it is totally understandable that Liverpool fans’ reaction to criticism of the club’s response to the tragedy would be one of dismay, after all, their work towards raising funds for the families and raising awareness towards the aim of clearing the names of those so horribly besmirched by the police, the government and sections of the media, is to be applauded. The events of April 15, 1989 should never be forgotten, and any attempt to commemorate the memories of those who lost their lives should be embraced by all of football, not just Liverpool. And if Liverpool are uncomfortable with playing on April 15, then that’s fine, barring any exceptional circumstances that make this unworkable. Unfortunately, 2012 has brought up these circumstances.

Chelsea are in a fixture log-jam at the moment. Their next four games are Spurs (N), Barcelona (H), Arsenal (A) and Barcelona (A), all of which take place in the space of only eight days. Pushing back the Spurs game by 24 hours would give them a little bit of breathing room and would prevent them from having to rest players from games that will decide their season. But that has been determined by the FA to be impractical. Why? Because Liverpool won’t play on the Sunday, as it’s April 15. Again, their reasons for this are understandable, but on this one occasion, couldn’t they have made an exception?

Think about it. Liverpool vs Everton. At Wembley. If you want to show your determination to get Justice For The 96, then what better stage to do it than in the nation’s capital, in the largest stadium in the country, and within 20 minutes of the houses of parliament, just in case you fancied petitioning the Prime Minister et al in person that day? Isn’t that a better image to portray of the club, as one that works with others to ensure that English clubs can succeed in Europe AND show the world that the lessons of what happened on that awful day have been learned?

But no. Once again, faced with the tiniest scrap of criticism, Liverpool respond with the same petulant arrogance that led to them wearing t-shirts supporting Luis Suarez in the immediate aftermath of his altercation with Patrice Evra. Any and all suggestions that Liverpool Football Club has done anything wrong, on any level, are met with furious rants and ridiculous ripostes. You only need to see one of Kenny Dalglish’s press conferences to experience the level of incredulous disbelief that comes across him when he’s asked even the mildest of questions.

And it’s only natural that the fans of Liverpool will replicate such reactions, such is the high regard that “King Kenny” is held in. And as is the nature of being a football supporter, you often find yourself obligated to defend your club’s “honour” at a moment’s notice. But ever since Man United surpassed their haul of 18 league titles, (and are now closing in on No.20), they’re beginning to run out of material. It’ll be 22 years since they’ve won the league, and they look no closer to ending that drought now than they did since sacking Rafa Benitez. For over 40 years, they’ve been able to lord it over the rest of us, thanks to their incredible success. But those days are over now. And it hurts.

That’s why the famous Scouse humour has been found lacking of late, they don’t find losing to be funny. And that’s fine. As I wrote in last week’s piece, nobody likes to lose, especially me. But it’s the stubborn resistance to accept any blame for what is happening which is so grating to the rest of football fans. Excuse after excuse is wheeled out to bail out the players and its manager, and any attempts to counter those arguments is dismissed as “Anti-Liverpool”, no matter how much logic is involved. This “Us against the World” attitude is unhealthy, it’s arrogant, and it’s unbecoming of a club of Liverpool’s stature. They’re better than that, so is it too much to expect them to act like it for once?

But before I get accused of taking a cheap shot at Liverpool by LFC fans, I’d like to point out this, which was unveiled before the Man City game on Sunday:

I cannot begin to describe how irate I am when I see that. Some mug has decided that he wants his 15 minutes of fame, and instead of trying to come up with a clever pun or song to poke fun at Nasri, he’s decided to be childish and puerile instead, just for added shock value. It’s crass, it’s homophobic (It should be “Petit Pute” as Samir is a bloke. This mug has deliberately decided to add an “e” to make him feminine. Satirical elegance, it isn’t.) and it’s something that, quite frankly, we should be above doing. We made our point at the end of the game by winning it. We don’t need some two bob banner that makes sexist slurs about an ex-player who committed the heinous crime of leaving his job for a better paid one. Why go to the bother of printing up such an idiotic sign, when all you need to do is point at the scoreboard once the game is over?

I just hope that this “effort” was just an isolated incident and not a sign of things to come. I don’t want us to become a reactionary, abuse-throwing mob who sees no faults in their club and instead chooses to blame everyone else instead to cover up our own deficiencies. I’m proud that the vast majority of Arsenal fans can have wildly differing views on a range of subjects, yet still carry themselves with class and dignity. If we lose that, then we lose our identity. Playing the Blame Game always leads to the same result:

Nobody wins.

[ad#Google Adsense-2]

------------
If you’ve been having problems accessing this site on your work computer using the URLS globalgooners.com and gossip.globalgooners.com should sort that problem for you.

Get your free LadyArse app here for Android, BlackBerry and Windows phone [iPhone coming soon]

Get your free Arsenal wallpaper, Facebook covers and Twitter headers here

Share

About Stephen Bradley

Gooner and below-average blogger who writes what he thinks, but sometimes doesn't think as he writes. Very occasionally makes a sensible point though, so watch out for that. Can be found on Twitter rambling away under the username @bradley08.
  • Dan

    Disregarding anything else a memorial service for the families is held at anfield on the 15th of April every year, which the players, manager and staff attend thus making it impossible for them to also be elsewhere playing football.

  • Mark

    Couldn’t agree more – just one question though, what was the homophobic aspect of the sign ? My understanding is that expression means “little whore”

  • Liamkane

    surely the “little whore” banner was referencing the fact that nasri basicly prostituted himself to the highest bidder..  i cant see anything homophobic about that 

  • Liamkane

    id hazard a guess that someone unintelligent enough to be homophobic or prejudice in any way isnt intelligent enough to use the feminine tense as an insult lol 

  • longsufferingkopite

    Your logic is very selective.
    Are you really naive enough, or downright biased enough, to presume that Liverpool have never encountered the possibility of being scheduled on April 15th in the last 21 (ie excluding 1989 and 2012) years? Basic maths estimates we have had 6 weekend April 15th’s in those years.

    I myself recall Liverpool participating in European competition (back in the good old days), part of which was scheduled for April 15th. We played on the other day (Champions League fixtures are split between tuesdays and wednesdays of course). Which must have been to the detriment of at least one other team whose fixture list became more cluttered than ours as we couldn’t play the 15th.
    On the estimated 3 times the 15th was a saturday, Liverpool were allowed by the FA not to play it. I’m sure that some teams who then had to play on the saturday were more tired than we were and their players deserved the rest that the extra day would have given them. Are you seriously claiming that an epiphany should occur now, destroying the FA’s establishment of compassion?

    Why can you not blame the disgression of the FA here? Liverpool cannot prevent them from scheduling a game on the 15th. And the resentment would only last until the end of the season- in fact we’ve seen worse treatment recently, it will be refreshing to see some distinctly sane reasoning behind a decision. A sizeable donation by the FA to the Hillsborough Justice Campaign would extinguish the fire that may have burned bridges.

    In addition, you need to elaborate on how “petulant arrogance” has featured here. If you can show me any club employee being unduly outraged about the possibility of the playing on the 15th, then your remark is valid. I, however, suspect that your remark was the “cheap shot” that many know you enjoy taking.
    For all you know, Ian Ayres and Tom Werner spoke in a gentlemanly fashion to the FA the minute that Liverpool won the quarter-final and were given reassurance that Liverpool could organise the Hillsborough service on the 15th.
    In fact, the FA are as likely to have called Ayres and Werner first, just to say they had already been scheduled for the 14th. AS WITH THE OTHER 6 TIMES THAT HAVE AFFECTED PREMIER LEAGUE CLUBS, LET ALONE EUROPEAN CLUBS.

    Your reasoning that the memorial service could be substituted for the cup tie, which you believe could remember and honour the event, is completely and utterly nonsensical. I’ve seen 6,000 attend a Hillsborough memorial service. We’ll estimate that 5,000 (although I personal believe it would be more than that) are Liverpudlians. A minority of those could afford to pay for travel, tickets and accommodation (assuming that they were shrewd enough to take their own food and drink and were able to park for free should they be using a vehicle). 
    The majority would be deprived of the comfort given to them on the most painful day of their year.

    I look forward to your highlighting of Liverpool’s petulant arrogance in this situation and how you propose that the majority of those affected remember Hillsborough as they can’t get to London or how the majority would be comforted as effectively as the service on the 15th. Furthermore, it would be divine if you could show that the FA have been tied to a chair, had a gun put to their head and have been forced to move a pen using their teeth to write a contract promising to schedule Liverpoon on the 14th this year and have NOT used the logic that they have employed since 1990, which Liverpool have not touched this year.

    • Anonymous

      Thanks for replying at such length. I will attempt to answer your queries as best as possible.
      A: A lot of the responsibility for this situation does lie with the FA. With Liverpool feeling so strongly about not playing on April 15, they should have come up with alternate dates for these semi-finals to avoid putting both Liverpool and Chelsea in the bind that they now find themselves in, i.e Have one of the semi’s on Friday the 13th, the second on the Saturday. That way, no-one plays on April 15, and everyone is satisfied.
      B: Here is Kenny speaking last month: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2117025/Kenny-Dalglish-hopes-Merseyside-derby-FA-Cup-semi-final.html “I don’t think it’s even worth a line in the paper that we might play on the 15th, because we won’t.” Not the most diplomatic tone, that. Again, these are a unique set of circumstances, as Chelsea are now forced to play a more compacted schedule through no fault of their own. With the lack of forward-planning on the part of the FA, I merely suggested that Liverpool should offer to play on the 15th as a one-off. A similar thing happened to Man Utd a few years ago with the 50th anniversary of the Munich disaster, yet they managed to turn the day into a poignant memorial to those who died. I’m sure that Liverpool could easily manage something similar. Yet when anything like this is even mentioned by the media, they get the same response, or something similar, to what I’ve linked above. Instead of seizing the inititive with this, Liverpool have been happy to let others make the decisions, just as long as April 15 is kept free for them. And while up to now, that hasn’t caused a problem for any other club, this year it has. As soon as it became remotely possible that an April 15 game could happen, then Liverpool should have explored every avenue to fulfil that date, to the satisfaction of the families affected by Hillsborough. If that proved not to be possible, then so be it, and let the FA reschedule both Liverpool’s and Chelsea’s games. But they didn’t. They just repeated what they’ve been saying, that they won’t play April 15. And from the outside looking in, that comes across as petty, even if it isn’t intended to be that way. C: At the end of the day, this is only my opinion, it’s what I and I alone would try to do. I don’t know where the idea that I like taking “cheap shots” came from, but I can assure you that that is not the case. All of the above is just my take on this. It’s not written to inflame or to insult, it’s just how I see the issue at hand. I may be right, I may be wrong. Some folks agree with what I have written, others, like yourself, do not. And as with all discussions over football, the answer to our discussion probably lies somewhere between both our stances. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2117025/Kenny-Dalglish-hopes-Merseyside-derby-FA-Cup-semi-final.html#ixzz1rg07qCnI

  • http://twitter.com/Riderofrohan Jules

    You should withdraw the comment that the banner was homophobic. I happen to know the person who designed the banner as he is a member of our forums, and also happens to be French. There is no insinuation towards sexuality behind the banner, or even in the language itself and if you had spoken to someone who is native to France you would never have jumped to that conclusion.

    It’s a bit ironic that you make lots of valid points about Liverpool supporters jumping to conclusions, and not listening to what was actually said, and then go and do exactly the same thing.

    • Anonymous

      As I wrote in the column, that “e” on the end of the word “petit” changes the whole inflexion of the sign. Because it makes the insult a feminine one instead of a masculine one, it looks like a clear nod to the running joke that Samir is a lesbian. He may not have intended the sign to come across as homophobic, but it did.

      • http://twitter.com/Riderofrohan Jules

        Only to you, and you’re still wrong. There are genuine things in this world that are homophobic, and you cheapen the campaign to root it out by attaching it to that banner.

        • Anonymous

          I’m just commenting on what I saw. I feel that the banner was homophobic, for the reasons I outlined earlier. Many have agreed with me. You, and others, disagree. That’s fine. This is a subjective opinion, I don’t expect everyone to be in agreement with it, nor would I.

          But to suggest that I’m somehow cheapening the campaign to remove homophobia from football/society is grossly unfair. If anything, isn’t it a good thing that more and more people are as offended as I was by something that we think is homophobic? Would you rather I just shut up about it, because that would do more harm to this issue than pointing out something and end up being wrong about it?

          Like I said, if you say that this person didn’t intend for that banner to come across as even remotely homophobic, then that’s fine. I’m only saying, that to me personally, that’s how it came across.

  • Qs

    Whether you agree with Alan’s statement that they should play or not is one thing but the reaction is ridiculous. If Liverpool bloggers and tweeters, etc had written good arguments as to why they believe they shouldn’t play on the anniversary then fair enough but the fact so many of them are threatening him, trying to boycott him, etc for an opinion on match scheduling is pathetic. And before people start saying its just a lunatic fringe of the general Liverpool support please note that even the Hillsboro Justice Campaign have refused to take a donation from him. Its just the sort of overreaction and manufactured outrage Liverpool are famous for.

  • JFT96

    Have you not thought about the possibility that both games could have been played on the Saturday? The FA insisted that the game should have been played at Wembley…not Liverpool FC. It would have been easier to schedule the game in Manchester. Blame the FA and if it was such an inconvenience then why did Chelsea FC not make a more concerted plea? The police decided it could not be played on the Friday and ITV chose the late kick off for the Sunday.

    This has all been started by a comedian who has a tour to sell not Chelsea FC…enough said.

    As for Suarez i can assure you that the vast majority of fans would have him out of the club if it was proven his comments were racist. The fact the FA chose one mans word over another proved nothing as even a court of law could not convict Suarez on the evidence given. The club and SOME fans chose to believe Suarez. Only time will tell whether they were right to do so but as with your interpretation of the banner you have called someone homophobic and they said it wasnt intended that way. The FA would probably agree with you. Ironic that.

    The club has learnt lessons from the episode concerned and even Kenny has admitted the episode was not handled in the correct manner.

     Its ironic that nothing is really said about the England captain having a court case put back so Chelsea and England can have their best defender available and the fact he has helped to get them to the Semi Final of both competitions. Clearly there is more evidence to answer than the Suarez case for him to face criminal charges. How will you feel if Terry scores the winner against Arsenal and they go on to pip you to 4th place. I await the outcry.

    If you bothered to check the tributes held worldwide over the weekend by fans of other teams you would realise how respected the Liverpool fans are. Admittedly recent events have not been handled properly in my opinion but we as fans will learn too. Im sure Ian Wright would have loved to have had the support of such a club and fans in the wake of the racist allegations  he made regards Peter Schmiechel but was forced to withdraw his complaint.

    Im sure you are old enought to remember the scenes post Hilssborough and the fact Liverpool had to play x amount of games in a very short period as the FA would not extend the season. I dont recall you or Davies moaning then or congratulatiing the iverpool fans on staying to applaud the Arsenal players and for the Kop to sing Champions to them?Blackburn and even Man Utd/Leeds before my time have had the same reception on winning titles at Anfield. We are not above criticism but i think the hospitality that opposing fans of clubs all over Europe receive at Anfield is legendary and recent episodes regards Suarez will not dampen that. We as a people are hospitable and sportmanlike so for us to be outraged i think you need to look at why we are outraged in the first place. The disaster is completely different to any other because there is an ongoing fight for justice to clear the 96 names. I suggest you thank yourself lucky that stadia are now a comparitively safe place to go..no fences and less hooliganism. It could easily have been Arsenal fans. I know we would not have voiced the same concerns if the boot was on the other foot.

    I just think the whole episode shows the lack of respect for the 96 people who died going to a football game. It could have been any of us.Why not ask your fellow gooners to join the campaign for justice so the families can gain closure and the 96 can rest in peace. The wounds are still open because of the injustice and hence the ‘outrage’ you insinuate. Once there is closure i suspect over time that the club will play on this date in future. Best of luck and remember it is only football after all. YNWA everyone  

Categories

The LadyArse Team on Twitter