Categorized | Arsenal, League Cup

Sign him up! Why Walcott deserves his new contract regardless of hat-trick against Reading.

I’ve been wanting to write about our much maligned no14 for  a while, and in the light of his match winning role in the Mad Stad goal-fest last night, now seems like a good time.

I’ve long been a defender of Theo, feeling that his late start in football, combined with his early first team exposure and physical attributes would cause his development as a player to be unusual.

His acceleration is a vital component of our otherwise relatively one-paced attack, and teams find it much easier to squeeze us in midfield without him in the side. This is particularly important away from home against attacking sides, as it gives us a potential out-ball and creates more space for the likes of Cazorla.

This has always been his strength, but over the last two seasons we have seen steady progress which would justify meeting his wage demands.

1. Behind Podolski, he is the second best finisher in the squad.

His calmness in front of goal has returned. For Southampton’s youth and reserve teams and in his first games for them, his finishing was natural and wonderfully efficient. Since then we’ve only seen glimpses. The pressures of top flight football, the exposure of technical weaknesses and the England 2006 debacle, seemed to totally undermine his confidence, and the shooting boots all but vanished. Over the last 15 months however, despite the odd blip, his finishing has improved immeasurably, and as Wenger said recently, you now expect him to score more often than not, and he has become far more accomplished when he has time to think. According to EPL Index,  last season he had a shot accuracy ratio of 59%, 11th in the Barclays Premier League.

2. He has become a man.

Walcott has become much more assertive, both in terms of physicality and a willingness to take responsibility. His first seasons were characterised by long periods of time looking like a lost boy on the touchline, trying to impress but doing so without conviction, and frequently bullied by experienced opponents. While he will always remain a slight figure, and isn’t going to grow any more, he has become harder to knock off his feet.  He is no longer scared of ‘going into traffic’, and as his dribbling skill has slowly improved, he is more willing to come off his wing and commit defenders through direct running, and head for the penalty area sooner. This is in part because he is far more comfortable with the risks of physical contact.

This increased ‘fight’ has also been shown by his reaction to being on the fringes of the team this season, and his comments regarding his contract negotiations. He knows what he wants, and is taking responsibility to make it happen. In almost every appearance this season he has had an impact. He is our top scorer in all competitions with seven goals, and has also racked up three assists, and created a few other very presentable chances. Some still view him as an impact player, but I would rather start a player that can have an impact than a James Milner.

3. He has shown the work ethic to improve his all-round game.

Walcott has had to develop the all-round attributes to be a high level professional footballer under the brightest of spotlights rather than in the reserves due to his incredible pace. His decision making deficiencies  were highlighted, but he also had significant technical limitations compared to many of his team-mates. Progress has seemed slow, but his weight of passing, close control and delivery from wide areas is unrecognisable compared to the teenage whippet. He is now consistently creating chances when given space, and loses the ball less often in tight areas. What has impressed me most recently, though is his noticeable improvement from set pieces. Even before last night, I had noticed that he is a far better corner taker than any of our regular choices, putting the ball into dangerous areas with pace, rather than the usual method of hitting the first man employed by all others bar Rosicky. He has also started fancying himself from free-kicks. While still no Thierry, he has shown a very similar technique, that if he can hone further could be a real weapon. Given our usual woeful use of the dead ball, it would seem he has been putting extra hours in.

4. He now thinks like a footballer on the pitch.

Ok. So he’ll never be a Fabregas, Bergkamp or Brady, but Walcott’s footballing instincts are no longer open to derision from Chris Waddle et al. His assessment of the percentages has developed to the point where he can safely recycle possession for the side, and even when off form like last Spring he is no longer a passenger. He has clearly taken his crossing lessons from David Beckham to heart, as he is choosing much more dangerous areas to put the ball into from wide, and is now capable of creating chances by making half a yard rather than racing blindly towards the byline. Equally the timing and angle of his runs has become much more dangerous and he has also become far more adept at reading his team-mates intentions.

5. He is delivering over the course of a season.

Despite patches of poor form, since the start of the 2010/11 season, Walcott has racked up 31 goals and 23 assists in 95 games. While those are hardly Thierry Henry figures, that still means he has been responsible for 0.57 goals a game. He also created more clear cut chances than any other wide player last season (EPL Index again). When one considers how often he didn’t complete 90 minutes in that time, they are not figures to be sniffed at. That’s better than Nani, Antonio Valencia, Ashley Young, Fernando Torres and Samir Nasri, and only just behind Luis Suarez and Mario Ballotelli. Statistics aren’t everything, and the likes of Nasri certainly contribute more to continuity of play, but equally the object of football is to score goals.

6. He has an increasing impact against big teams.

Over the last 2 years, as his overall game has improved, he has shown a handy habit of scoring in big games. As well as one in each leg in the Champion’s League qualifier against Udinese last year, he has goals and assists against Man Utd and Barcelona, and thrives in London derbies, with a good goalscoring and assist record against Spurs, Chelsea and West Ham. And lest we forget he has scored in the only cup final he has played in, and was badly missed against Birmingham city 18 months ago. While often accused of mental weakness, his record against the ‘big’ sides is as good as his overall record, which cannot be said for too many of our other attacking players.

 

Looking forward, I think there are other very good reasons why the club should show some flexibility to retain his services.

  • At 23, his transfer value will not diminish unless he suffers a career changing injury. He also should continue to improve as a footballer for another four or five years.
  • Though reliant on his pace, his efficient running style and athletic physique is not like to decline quickly.
  • Him and Giroud already seem to have a good understanding, and given their strengths are an obvious combination, with one offering pace against high back lines, and the other a physical impact against teams that defend deep.
  • In the right tactical set up, he can be a 20 goal striker if played up front or continue to contribute from out wide.
  • He is a marketing dream, and will generate the club a lot of revenue even if his development stalls, particularly in the far east, where they seem to love him. He could have a positive impact on the soon to be re-negotiated sponsorship deals.
  • The only other real pace in the squad is Gervinho, who makes Walcott look a model of consistency.
  • After losing Van Persie and Song, allowing our only other real attacking threat from last season to leave would be a very negative message to fans, sponsors and team-mates. He also seems popular with most of the squad, and has been making all the right noises about his long term future at the club.

According to reports in the mainstream media, he was due to have further contract talks with the club this week. I can only hope that they are fruitful, as it would a bitter disappointment to have nurtured a player to this point in his career only to lose them for peanuts. The will still appears to be there on both sides, so my fingers are crossed.

------------
If you’ve been having problems accessing this site on your work computer using the URLS globalgooners.com and gossip.globalgooners.com should sort that problem for you.

Get your free LadyArse app here for iPhone, Android, BlackBerry and Windows phone

Get your free Arsenal wallpaper, Facebook covers and Twitter headers here

Share

About lomekian

Matthew Wade , or @lomekian on Twitter. Arsenal, Middlesex Cricket Club and Detroit Red Wings Fan. Professional actor and voice-over artist. Former employment advisor and project manager. See my websites http://edgeofthearea.wordpress.com/ & www.matthewwade.co.uk
  • NaijaGunner

    SIGN HIM up..give him 95k or 90k,he shld take it…dt boy played his heart out for 120 mins yesterday..he still has potential,and like it or not he is probably one of the top 3 wingers in english football..and he will b a great striker..he has more potential than Adebayor had,when he came frm monaco(shitty finisher) then.

    • http://twitter.com/lomekian lomekian

      To be fair, given his size and atheleticism, Adebayor had the potential to be as good as Drogba if he had stayed switched on at Arsenal. He did the dirty on us for cash, and now is on the bench at Spurs.

  • Reagon Bessick

    I will seriously hate if we lose Theo AS WELL!!

  • davi

    I don’t buy into the opinion that we should cash in on theo because he’s not consistent enough, he’s a very useful and important member of the squad BUT we cannot be held to ransom. If he wants the sort of money we would only have spent on RVP, he simply has to go. Think, he would be better paid than players like Podolski, Cazorla and Arteta – the KEY men in the squad! You could even argue that Theo is also a key player, which is certainly a reasonable position given his output over the last couple of seasons, but he’s not better or more experienced than these players and should only be paid to their level, not 30% more than them!

    • http://twitter.com/lomekian lomekian

      No evidence he wants RVP money. I think the rumoured figures of 90-100k p/w is fair enough in today’s market given his re-sale value and output. More than that I would question, but really its remarkable the club has been foolish enough to get themselves into a position where he has quite so much bargaining power.

      • davi

        I think 100k pw is RVP-money? My understanding is the highest paid players are on something like 80k, and I don’t see why theo should be made the highest paid player at the club.
        It’s largely the club’s fault for having this crazy structure where all the 1st team players are paid at least 50k just for being there, regardless of output, but still, Theo shouldn’t be allowed to dictate the structure. If we give him 100k pw, what’s to stop Cazorla or Arteta asking for 120k pw in the summer? They’re clearly our best and most important players and this could end with them or others leaving, just like Song did.

        • http://twitter.com/lomekian lomekian

          Neither are as young, have his resale value or marketability. Purely as a business asset, he is worth more to the club. For my money he should be first choice on the right, and as such is worth it. As for RVP we offered something in the region of 130k-140k according to reports, and he’s on comfortably over 200k at Man U. Song is a good player, but goalscorers will always get more cash, as goals win games

          • davi

            I think you’d be hard-pressed to find many more valuable or marketable players than Cazorla at the moment. They’re using his image on the Sky Sports website – the whole country is taken with him.

            The thing that doesn’t make sense is that Theo isn’t even the finished article. What’s he going to want next time around? And if he’s already our highest paid player, would we really be willing to pay him more??? If he was now our best player then that would be understandable, but he’s just not. I think he’d just about be 1st choice on the right, but even that’s not 100% clear.

            As I say, this is all the club’s fault in reality. We bumped his wages to 50k pw before he’d even played well twice in a row, and now we’ve got ourselves in a pickle with a player we don’t really want to lose but can’t really justify breaking the bank to keep, at least with respect to the other members of the squad.

            Btw, he’s scored 18 goals (10 in the league) since the start of last season. He scores goals for sure, but he’s not really a proven goalscorer yet. Let him prove that first, then he can legitimately ask for the big money. He’s still a work in progress, so let’s not pay him like he’s already made it – that was the problem in the 1st place.

          • http://twitter.com/lomekian lomekian

            Cazorla is very marketable at the moment, but he is new and the sheen may wear off. With Theo I’m thinking more of the far east. The Chinese and Japanese LOVE him. Perhaps there can be some sort of compromise regarding image rights.

            In terms of value, it doesn’t seem right to make him our highest paid player, but then a decent goalscoring run would suddenly make that seem fair. He could earn more at Utd, Chelsea, Liverpool, City and numerous other clubs on the continent, and while we can’t compete with Oligarchs if the market of clubs without external backing sets a certain value, then we have to compete with that.

            And despite being an inconsistent winger, he’s scored almost twice as many as Torres during the same time period…..

            In my article I pointed out players with similar statistical outputs. All except perhaps Valencia earn more than the figures we are discussing, and only Ballotelli has more potential to develop.

            The market has changed. Its sucks, but thats the way it is

          • davi

            I don’t think Torres is a good comparison because he basically just had a bad time at chelsea for whatever reason – prior to his move to chelsea he was the most efficient striker in terms of goals:games in the PL, so it makes sense that he’d be on a lot of money, but every transfer comes with a risk, and it coincided with injury problems.

            Also, I don’t see how a potential to develop is relevant in the contract. Surely the big contract should be a reward for having developed to a certain level. This has been the problem to date.

            You make good points particularly wrt the other players. It’s interesting because I don’t see Theo as being as proven a wide player as, say, Valencia, who is extremely consistent and contributes well in every game, yet, Theo has a better record in terms of goals and assists. You have to say that Valencia contributes more in other areas and is more consistent, though. I think the major difference between Theo and those other players is that they’ve proven capable of winning things. Obviously it’s not all Theo’s fault he hasn’t won anything yet, but this is where it get’s complicated. All of those players have shown the mentality to win when it counts, but Theo hasn’t yet. He might argue it’s the team that has been poor, of course.

            How about comparing with Gareth Bale? He’s of a similar age, improving rapidly and not winning anything, and he’s not on these huge wages. He’s also considered world class by most of the country and in Europe and I’d think most people believe him to be better than Theo currently.

          • http://twitter.com/lomekian lomekian

            I don’t know what Bale’s wages are, but having just signed a new contract I bet they are up there. Also, despite being his team’s go to man, his stats aren’t actually much different to Walcott’s over the same period. For me they are totally different players, and it always looked like AW missed a trick on that one. I think they could have happily co-existed.

            Valencia offers more, and I think is more consistent, but his contract is not about to expire, which is the key in all this. As soon as you are competing with people who can sign your player on a bosman, the game changes.

            Also for me, as long as a player has reached a certain level, potential IS a factor in contract negotiation. If tying a player down for five years, where he is likely to be in 4 years time has to be a factor. Or you end up like Mark Hughes, paying peak value for players in fees and wages, most of whom will represent worse and worse value for money as their contract goes on. Its why Wenger only gives more than 1 year contracts to players over thirty if they take less than the going rate and show themselves to be physically reliable.

          • davi

            “Also for me, as long as a player has reached a certain level, potential IS a factor in contract negotiation”

            But haven’t we made this mistake too many times before? With Bendtner, Denilson and even Theo in the early days. We gave him 50k pw when he was a 10k pw player, and before he even reached that 50k pw level we gave him 70k pw – where does it end? If we reward potential instead of achievement, then it sends the wrong message. Denilson is a great example of a really talented player who needed a massive boot up the backside, but his ego was clearly bigger than it should have been and he only really turned up against Utd or Barcelona in the end. Maybe the fact that he was treated as an indispensible first teamer, rather than a youthful squad player was part of the reason for this. Of the 3, it is at least true that Theo has shown the greatest desire to succeed despite these contractual mistakes, but still I don’t think it’s the best way to run the club. The Bale example is a good one because even if he has just signed a big contract, he’s pretty much Spurs’ best player – he will have earned it before he got it, not the other way around.

            “but his contract is not about to expire, which is the key in all this”

            I don’t see the fact that his contract is due to expire as a reason to pay more than he is worth now. That would be holding the club to ransom which I don’t think they should tolerate. Theo’s obviously a quality player, but not of the level that we couldn’t replace him.

          • http://twitter.com/lomekian lomekian

            Indeed. But market value is defined by what others in a similar position are prepared to pay. I don’t include the oligarchs, but other self-sustaining clubs of a similar size. Even Spurs are feeling the pinch of wage inflation.

            I think the argument about over-paying the youngsters holds water but is a massive simplification. Bendtner’s ego was legendary when he was in the reserves, and in the right team set up he is worth his contract. Certainly for Denmark he looks a 50k p/w striker, and on the rare occasions he played up front with Arshavin. Denilson was always over-rated by the manager for me, but I think his disappointing performances had less to do with ego than ability. After an encouraging start he failed to develop physically in terms of pace or strength, so Arsene tried to make him adapt his play to a more defensive role, and the player lacked the instincts, desire or capacity to fulfil it. For me, he never really kicked on from the first 18 months at the club, and his contract WAS a joke. But while one can criticise Walcott for his uneven development curve and the flaws in his game, as I pointed out he still stands up statistically with players at more successful clubs with similar wages to those he wants. And the fact that on top of this his development trajectory suggests that his statistical return will only improve over the duration of a new contract, given his age and improved finishing, he represents as good value if not better. This is because part of the payment is to retain an asset, as well as the work done on the field, and Walcott is an asset whose resale value is safe if under contract.

            His contract expiry is key. With 6 months left and potential bosmans on the horizon, we’d be lucky to get 10m for him. With a 5 year contract, we could at least double that on an open market. Which at least covers the cost of the extra 25k p/w.

            From a business sense accordingly its a sensible decision (particularly if they can reach a compromise over image rights), and from a footballing decision, he is an improving player, already fully integrated into the squad, who can be an important asset to us.

            I know the argument is regarding the clubs wage structure, but given the acceptance from the club that this needs to change, perhaps now is the time. If he refused to sign and they wanted to cash in, the time was in the summer, when they could have got better value and replaced him. Now, for me, the cost of doing so is greater than the cost of keeping him.

          • davi

            The only thing I will disagree on is Denilson. He showed, even in his last season, that he was capable of playing very well against Barcelona and Utd, but the effort was clearly lacking against the less talented sides, and he was constantly exposed for that. I don’t think it was a talent issue, it was a psychological flaw, but it’s a side point.

            Anyway you make some great points. On the one hand, I’d be happy for Theo to stay because he’s a major contributor to the club, but I just worry about the knock-on effects of giving him a big contract. Either way, it will be a risk for the club, but maybe I’m over-blowing the risk of giving him, say, 100k pw to stay. I guess time will tell.

          • http://twitter.com/lomekian lomekian

            I thought he struggles against the big sides in his last 18 months, but we shall agree to differ.

          • davi

            Also, I brought up Song because it seems he left because he was being paid practically the same as players like Diaby, Denilson, Djourou and Bendtner and less than players like Walcott – Song obviously contributed FAR more to the club over the past 3 years than any of those players and it’s understandable that he became disillusioned. This could happen again if we continue like this

          • http://twitter.com/lomekian lomekian

            I had heard his departure was a combination of wanting to go Barca when they expressed an interest, and a training bust up with Bouldy. Also song may have wanted to re-negotiate his contract, but he had fairly recently signed an earlier one, and had three years left. It was a shame he left, but the speed at which it happened, the manager’s reluctance to talk about it and whispers from people around the club suggest his departure was not particularly mourned.

  • Darren

    Good Article Lom. I feel he has more to offer than many appreciate. He is a very enigmatic player and we don;t have many of those tbf!

  • jeff wright

    Theo will be difficult to replace just when he looks to be maturing into a future top player. I can’t imagine United or even Chelsea letting a young talent like him leave. But unfortunately I can see Mr Profitmaker Ivan doing it.
    To be fair though even before he turned up at AFC we were selling top players to our rivals – rather than paying them the going rate – and thus missing out on the potential that they had developed at our club.

    Did Arsene get it wrong playing Walcott for 120 minutes in the LC tie at Reading ? Perhaps he intended to pull him off after 70 minutes when making his customary substitutions. However circumstances forced him into having to leave Walcott on – with him obviously our forward player who was causing the most problems for the Reading defense.
    The League Cup is a competition that Wenger has said in the past that he wouldn’t celebrate winning – because he wouldn’t feel as though he had won a trophy – and recently made clear that it lies at the bottom of his list of priorities. Walcott himself said that he was shattered after his heroics against Reading.

    We need a performance like the Reading one from him at Old Trafford to help in our efforts to finish 4th in the league – a ‘trophy’ that Arsene does celebrate winning. If Wenger did make a mistake by playing Theo at Reading – while RVP and Rooney had a weeks rest, is something that we will learn at Saturday lunch-time.

    • http://twitter.com/lomekian lomekian

      Perhaps he was always planning to play ramsey? Theo never gets much joy out of Evra, and ramsey is far better and covering back

  • Kevin Ward

    at least I;m not on my own in regards to theo…… The boy has been nothing but topclass in terms of his attitude and at 23 you can forgive him for wanting some sort of assurance as to his playing position. He has been played in a position you know he isnt comfortable with for almost 7 years now. who in the game do you know that would do this without batting an eyelid?? The boy wants to be a legend at our club. why not give him his chance? i feel he has more than earned it. Besides can you imagine the look on hansen smug little mug when he has to praise the little speed demon

    • http://twitter.com/lomekian lomekian

      I can certainly understand his feeling on the issue!

Categories

The LadyArse Team on Twitter