Categorized | Arsenal, Features, Transfers

Transfers won’t change the Arsenal way

The start of a new year brings more than just hangovers and resolutions, it also brings our bi-annual dose of enhanced transfer speculation. It’s amazing how a club so notoriously frugal and reluctant to sign players still has fans convinced it will break the bank every transfer window.

It’s hard not to become engrossed in it, and I’ve spent my fair share of January 31‘s tuned into SkySportsNews hoping Arsenal will announce a last minute superstar signing. I was crushed when we didn’t sign Xavi Alonso in 2008, I was dismayed at the lack of activity last January, and I clicked refresh on Newsnow far too frequently whilst we were supposedly tying up the Sahin deal last August.

However none of it really matters. The problems inherent in the current team are exactly the same as the teams that preceded it. The personnel have changed but the same mistakes remain.

We still don’t take games against supposedly lower opposition seriously and we still seem vulnerable from every attack. Furthermore, we still can’t take any semblance of a decent corner and we still have a near constant injury crisis. We still pay absolutely zero attention to the tactical demands of the teams we are facing, and our team is still shrouded in doubt over the contract of one of its stars. We still start games excruciatingly slowly, and most painfully of all we still seem to be content to just meander along doing enough necessary to secure 4th place

Signing David Villa or Adrian Lopez won’t change any of the above.

If they do, the fear is it will be short term.

Arshavin came in the January transfer window, set the world alight, and look what happened to him. Reyes arrived in Janaury and looked a world beater, then look what happened to him. Even Chamakh started his Arsenal career brightly, and the less said about him the better.

“This club has a particular approach, a philosophy, and whoever the players are, we play in the same way” – Arsene Wenger

The above quote tells you all you need to know.

To borrow an oft repeated phrase, ‘the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over again and expect different results.’

Unfortunately Arsenal do the same thing over and over again, and it does get the desired result – qualification for the Champions League. If that is the sum of your ambition for the club then there really is no need to change anything.

I like to believe there are people at Arsenal, and I include the manager in this, who have ambition that extends far beyond finishing 4th. Yet it will take more than adjusting the playing personnel to achieve it.

A change in mentality would be a start. Like taking games against lesser opposition as seriously as you would a Champions League game. It was infuriating to watch as Kieron Gibbs, with 92 minutes on the clock against Southampton, wandered over to take a throw and took precisely 28 seconds to get the ball back into action. Ask yourself if a player of Utd, Chelsea or City would be allowed to take such a delay when chasing the game.

It’s not unfair to single players out, and at least Gibbs did more than just swing his leg at a football which cannot be said for our right back, who was so uncharacteristically bad that it’s not unreasonable to think it was a body double playing out there.

With four minutes of injury time against Wigan, whilst desperately holding onto an undeserved 1-0 lead, the Arsenal team, a team with more technical ability and skill to hold onto the ball than any other in the league, decided that they were totally incapable of holding onto the ball, slowing down play, or even completing a two yard pass to another man in a red shirt. It was utter stupidity from the playing personnel and I can’t fathom how we escaped Wigan with all 3 points.

Apologies for the perceived negativity, but after re-watching the Southampton game again, I just can’t bring myself to get even remotely excited by the January transfer window. Supporting Arsene Wenger’s Arsenal is like being stuck in groundhog day year after year. Hope replaced by despair, replaced by hope, and then despair. It’s a constant cycle.

The hope brings us back in. Just as recently as a four game winning run, you start to forget about the losses and the obvious flaws with the team, you start envisioning a late run at the title, until a performance like Southampton reminds you why we are in our current position.

Until there is a change in the fabric of the club; this culture of accepting mediocrity, of doing just enough to get by, then the cycle won’t break anytime soon.

I truly hope we do bring in quality additions, lord knows this team needs it, but it won’t be long before they too become accustomed to the Arsenal way.

------------
If you’ve been having problems accessing this site on your work computer using the URLS globalgooners.com and gossip.globalgooners.com should sort that problem for you.

Get your free LadyArse app here for Android, BlackBerry and Windows phone [iPhone coming soon]

Get your free Arsenal wallpaper, Facebook covers and Twitter headers here

Share

About Lewis

Clock End season ticket holder. Some-time writer. Follow me on Twitter @changearsenal All views are my own.
  • DaveyDMX

    Erm, when did you write this, 2 years ago?

    I only ask because we have a pretty healthy squad right now and our set pieces have improved too. Not brilliant, but still an improvement! And the defence is far from fragile as this author makes out.

    It just another cut and paste tabloid light piece of simpleton speak chatter.

    Sorry, but this berk has no insight has allowed himself to be carried away by the very media he suggests we ignore.

    E for effort

    • Lewis

      Diaby, Walcott, Gibbs, Wilshere, Rosicky have all missed significant games this season, and with a squad as thin as ours one injury can change everything.. Next game you watch just take a look at how many corners hit the first man, or free kicks that hit the wall.
      As for our defence, I presume conceding 3 against Newcastle and Fulham is rock solid.
      And if you’re going to put an effort grade on a blog I think you’ll find its you who is the simpleton

      • Aleks

        And how about playing for a quarter of a season with our 3rd choice keeper… I support the main idea of the original blog – there are serious problems with team mentality. Too many good players became worse after they joined Arsenal. Lack of believe, lack of effort, lack of defensive discipline that remains unpunished are there for all to see. What does the lack of effort have to do with the new stadium, or the emergence of oil clubs, or lack of marketing? Good team is always better than the sum of its players – see Man United. Poor team is always worse than the sum of its players – see Arsenal. Now the question is why…I think LA is spot on here.

  • torranio

    Fuck The Wenger Way!…

  • Tom W

    Spot on! Agree with every word . The biggest indictment of Wenger’s system comes from ultimate insiders, former superstars themselves . Fabregas praised Wenger as the father figure and great man whilst describing Arsenal training regiment as amateur hour in comparison with Barca’s approach . RVP spoke highly of Wenger as a man as well but was critical of him as a tactician( the infamous Arshavin for Ox substitution) , and just recently said Man U was a special club where every player gave his all for another player. Funny how Feguson never talks about mental toughness at Man U . If you have it , you don’t have to talk about it.

  • Shard

    Another article (on the web, not this site per se) basically saying what Wenger DOESN’T bring to the table and what Arsenal lack. You can’t just do that. If being stuck in 3rd or 4th is a groundhog day of despair then I don’t know why most fans ever watch football at all. If you want a balanced view of all we lack, you also have to look at all we have.

    What are the alternatives to the Arsenal way of doing things? Let’s leave out Chelsea and ManCity because those are extreme opposites. Let’s say ManU. Everyone wants to aspire to their level of dominance, so they should be a good act to follow. That is actually exactly what we are doing. We’re following ManU’s path to success which began in the late 80s when they started marketing themselves globally. Liverpool (and Arsenal) were winning titles back then, and ManU were famously told to come back when they have 19 titles. Do you think ManU’s success hasn’t been built on being able to massively outspend everyone else? Likewise, the Invincibles were expensive to assemble, and paid handsomely compared to the rest of the league. Arsenal have only now started developing commercially (and have grown exponentially in the past decade) The only difference? ManU didn’t have to contend with oil clubs when they started growing. The Invincibles would never have been built today, and even if they were and were kept together somehow, wouldn’t win as much as they did, because the level of competition has increased.

    The other alternative is LIverpool. Spend to compete, until it goes wrong,. Go bankrupt. Aim to expand stadium or relocate. Have new owners come in and spend even more, and still not even get close to top 4 (the territory of drudgery apparently)

    What does that have to do with the article? Everything. It provides context to everything. We have poorer players because we can’t afford better (or couldn’t for a while), we have players on high contracts because during the time in the stadium move, the only way to ensure a team stayed together was to pay young players more than others would. A sort of ManCity model for the youth. Argue all you like against it, but it kept us top 4 all throughout, and would have won us the title in 2008 but for some horrendous refereeing decisions. The pay structure is going to change, as contracts run out, and our ability to pay more will also increase.

    Perhaps a change in mentality is needed amongst the fanbase as well. We decry us not being like the Invincibles. Not being like ManU, or Chelsea, and we look for a magical break from everything which will suddenly change all this. Maybe we should look at what we have, and giv credit to the strategy to not go down the sugar daddy route. I wouldn’t be happy if we did that. Within that strategy, we can look to improve of course. Some of which includes the manager, and the way the team plays. That management style is also what brings us the champagne football. You can’t really separate the two.

    Oh and the article contains two quotes. The problem with using quotes, is the same as the problem I have with this article. It lacks context.

    • Lewis

      Thanks for the extensive and articulate reply, and you could make this a blog post in its own right. I wrote a few weeks ago about what Wenger does and doesn’t bring to the table(in my opinion) – http://ladyarse.co.uk/arsenal/2012/12/the-arsene-wenger-question/

      In regards to your points – I agree that during the first years of the stadium move long contracts were necessary and the manager performed near miracles to get us into the top four, and remain in the Champions League spots.

      However that was then, finances are in place that we don’t need to shop at Primark anymore, and whilst encouraged by this summers acquisitions – who were all excellent signings – there is still a lot of money left to be used to improve the squad in areas which we are so clearly lacking. No Arsenal fan is asking we spend the money City or Chelsea do, but we are frequently told we will only invest in super quality that improves the squad. Why was money kept back last summer when inexpensive additions would be a clear upgrade on certain squad players?

      I do think being stuck in 3rd or 4th is groundhog day because whilst we all support clubs for varying reasons, ultimately football is about winning and success. I don’t feel a sense of entitlement but I do feel that we could muster a better challenge than this season, or last season, and to generate that kind of football we need to avoid the same mistakes that seem to be chronic within the fabric of our club, and our manager.
      Lastly, while we have on occasion produced champagne football, we can no longer claim to be the easiest on the eye stylistically. We all watched the Bradford, Norwich, Southampton, Wigan, QPR, UTD games, and those kind of performances are starting to considerably outweigh the champagne style.
      I wrote this article to point out that we’re stuck in a cycle which for the immediate future doesn’t seem like changing. Are you really happy with the status quo?

      • Shard

        change’s sake. I think it isn’t a permanent cycle. The signs of it changing are apparent with the signings over the past two windows. The age, and profile of the players we’ve bought are higher than we would have expected otherwise. (I think your article made mention of this too) Arsenal have also spent money in building a new medical centre (the positive effects of which are slowly becoming apparent)

        I agree that it can’t remain the way it has been in perpetuity. But I see signs of change. The money from the new deals still hasn’t come in. Yes, we have cash reserves, and we have used them, and should use them more. But for every Cazorla we manage to get, there’s a Mata, or a Hazard, who no matter what we offer, will always get more money elsewhere, and thereby opts for elsewhere.

        As to why money was held back? That can only be speculated upon. Maybe there isn’t as much money as is generally said (We waited for CL qualification last season before spending). Maybe Wenger has decided to keep the money for his successor. Maybe spending that money, on secondary (or tertiary) targets is not Wenger’s policy, and he feels spending it will not really improve our league position with those players (and thus better to preserve it for later) Or maybe the owner is out to rob us. Who knows? But the fact remains that Arsenal is carrying the costs of the stadium move (higher wages for ‘deadwood’, long term commercial deals) but those factors are GRADUALLY easing. It’s not going to become better instantly.

        My point about champagne football was to say that Wenger’s coaching style breeds both: the frustrations with lack of time wasting, set piece defending etc, but also the football we like. That it isn’t coming together is mostly down to constant upheaval in the squad. Which is down to money mostly. Again, something I think will improve soon. (And even more so if FFP works)

        And as an aside. The years without a trophy is overplayed when it comes it us. It’s been repeated as an issue and now its become accepted that ‘we don’t compete’. In the trophyless years,

        2006- CL final (lost to offside goals)

        2007- League Cup final

        2008- 3rd in league (robbed by refs, led to dismantling of side)

        2009- SF of FA Cup and CL

        2010- nothing much (though for a while we challenged the league)

        2011- In with chance of 4 trophies till Feb

        2012- nothing

        There have been various reasons we haven’t gotten over the line, but we’ve challenged quite often, interspersed with a few years of losing players and embarking on a mini-transition.

        Anyway. We’re actually not far apart in our views. I just think the club embarked on the correct strategy. Were unlucky that it coincided with the rise of the oilers and that this has delayed the payoff from the stadium move, but that with the new commercial deals, we’ll see an end to the cycle you complain about. I think it remarkable that in time of such upheaval, we’ve stayed consistent at this high a level.

        Sorry for the long response. I tend to go on, and didn’t know how to get my point across more succinctly.

  • Michael

    Well I just wanted to add a comment from a NON-London fan. I am a Yank I have been a Arsenal FC supporter since 1989. Now why? I am not from North London I have no relational or national team tie to any player that played for them. (If I wanted to support a team that had faith is Yank players I would be a Fulham supporter. NO I was first hooked on Arsenal Because of HOW Arsenal won that league title in 1989 my friends and fellow collage players at the time where Liverpool fans and They all expected Arsenal to loose that night but I watched more then a few games and there was just something about that team o for them as we all sat in a Boston Bar (there was no broadcast in the US except if you could find a bar with a satellite feed from England) I went crazy when Arsenal not only won but won by the two they needed to win the title. I was hooked. And through the years since then it has never been smooth but there was always a top team filled with big stars. players that where considered top level. I an a Arsenal supporter because Arsenal was a top team I could route for and I admit was a winner. I am not hooked I am red and white but lately I question WHY. thus team has not been a real contender for the title (a long shot a few times but seriously they have gotten so far off the pace the past 3 years that it is only our hope that they can pull it together maybe it was that 1989 season when everyone thought they had blown it and it came down to that last night at Anfield THat keeps me hoping as long as it is still mathematically possible I just can’t give up (even though it is highly unlikely) BUT how long do fans like me hold on? If Arsenal’s board really want to keep that international market they need to get serious about Winning and realize then need to spend to keep most of us we will never sit in a seat at the Emirates Stadium but we buy shirts pay for cable sports packages (which the league and teams benefit from with TV deals) we pay to be members of Arsenal FC though the Web so we can follow games. But if the board does not see we do so because we want to support a top club not just another league club. (those clubs that never win have little chance or winning but hang in there every year) Lately Arsenal has dropped and THAT is why players choose to sign with other clubs not just the wages or the signing deal it is they also no longer see Arsenal and differently then say Spurs or Everton we have become just another EPL team. ManCity bought their way in to the top ManU has history as a top club as does liverpool (the reason I think they will recover at some point) But Arsenal needs to remember if they are not careful they could return to the Per-Graham era where Arsenal’s biggest victory every year was just “TottenhamDay” the day Spurs can no no longer mathematically finish above Arsenal.
    THis season I am not sure we will even see a TottenhamDay

Categories

The LadyArse Team on Twitter