Categorized | Arsenal, Opinion

Time Immemorial

Arsenal shouldn’t build a statue of Dennis Bergkamp outside the Emirates Stadium.

No, wait, please, don’t go. I can explain. Honest.

Look, let there be no misunderstanding here. Dennis Bergkamp was easily one of the most talented footballers ever to play for Arsenal. He was one of those few players that fans of all clubs respected, and was in that rare group that would convince you to part with your hard earned cash to watch him play, no matter what the setting or who he was playing for, as you could never be sure of what magic trick you were going to see on that day.

This is why Messi gets so much love these days but Ronaldo doesn’t. Ronaldo is a fabulous footballer, capable of feats that few others have ever been able to match, but because there’s such a clinical nature to everything he does, there’s no sense of surprise when he does something incredible, such as averaging a goal a game whilst playing for Real Madrid. We expect that he’ll beat the defender with a perfect stepover, or that his technique will be impeccable when he strikes a free-kick towards goal. We know what he can do, so when he does it, we’re not taken aback by it, we just applaud it and move on.

Messi, on the other hand, possesses the one thing that fans value the most in footballers, and it’s something that for all his ability, Ronaldo doesn’t have; imagination. If you put both players in the same position, 25 yards from goal and gave them 100 attempts to score, then the difference between the two would become clear; Ronaldo would soon perfect one way of scoring and continue to use that method. Messi, on the other hand, would go the opposite route, he’d score in one fashion, let’s say he curled it into the bottom corner for example, and then would try something else, like lobbing the keeper or dribbling around him. He wouldn’t let success dictate what he was going to do next, thus leaving his mind free to survey the pitch and adapt accordingly, instead of reverting to something that has been honed for hundreds of hours on the training field.

It’s that sense of not knowing what Messi could do at any time that draws us towards wanting to see him play. As football fans, we can appreciate Ronaldo’s athleticism, his technique and his consistency. But as people, we want to be entertained, we want to be surprised. We want to show up at a football match, support our team and maybe see something that we hadn’t seen many times before. You get that with Messi. You got it with Zidane, with Maradona, with Cantona, with Zola, with Ronaldinho, with Le Tissier.

And you got it with Dennis Bergkamp.

So, with that four hundred word ode to Dennis on the record, let me now explain why a player as brilliant as Bergkamp shouldn’t be immortalised in bronze. Or, at least not by Arsenal anyway. See, if you’re going to build a statue of someone, then they should have accomplished something incredible, something that will never be forgotten, something that changed the course of the club’s history. And whilst Dennis’ contribution over the years was indeed immense, does it stand out enough from the rest of Arsenal’s achievements throughout the years to be singled out for such praise as a statue?

Tony Adams deserved to be singled out for captaining the side for 14 trophy-laden years. Thierry Henry deserved to be singled out because he’s scored more goals for Arsenal than anyone else has in the history of the club. Herbert Chapman deserves to be singled out for his success in revolutionising the club in the 1920′s and 30′s. The cases for all three are in-arguable. Dennis? Well, here’s my argument:

  • Cliff Bastin
  • Alex James
  • Charlie George
  • Frank McClintoch
  • Liam Brady
  • David Rocastle
  • Michael Thomas
  • Ian Wright
  • Gus Caesar (Just kidding.)
  • Bertie Mee
  • Bob Wilson
  • George Graham

Give me one reason as to why Dennis should be given this honour ahead of any of those on that list, because I can’t think of one. Again, I’m not downplaying what Bergkamp did whilst at the club, but to place him ahead of the others named above, is at the very least, bordering on the generous side. If the whole purpose of erecting these statues is to commemorate the past, then isn’t there a risk of devaluing that past by putting more importance on recent history ahead of it? Obviously, the club’s intention isn’t to rank players in terms of importance to the club when it’s being decided on who gets a statue next, but as anyone who has been picked last out of a group will tell you, it’s usually pretty clear as to why they were picked last instead of first.

Also, let us not forget that Dennis has already been recognised for his achievements at the club with the honour of having his testimonial being arranged as the first ever game to be played at the Emirates. Not exactly a half-hearted gesture, that. Thierry Henry hasn’t been given a testimonial at all. And before you all point out that as Henry is still plying his trade in New York, it would be a bit strange to have a testimonial for someone who hasn’t retired yet, may I point out that he has scored a goal in a stadium that had A STATUE OF HIM OUTSIDE IT. 

Dennis Bergkamp was a great player for Arsenal. But before he arrived at Arsenal, he had already been a great player at Ajax. It was only the fact that he wasn’t playing well for Inter that made him available to us. We bought a great player, and he performed at a great level. But is that enough to be an Arsenal legend worthy of a statue? I just don’t think it is, especially when given the alternatives named above. I concede that I’m judging him here to an extraordinarily high standard, but the whole point of casting statues is to celebrate the very, very, very best of Arsenal Football Club. It’s for icons and nobody else. We owe it to those whose legacy we have already celebrated, to be incredibly fussy about this sort of thing.

Was Dennis Bergkamp the best player that has ever played for Arsenal? Perhaps. But like the Messi/Ronaldo comparison earlier, it’s hard to imagine Dennis ever being revered by fans in the same way that Rocky Rocastle is, or Charlie George, or Ian Wright, or anyone else on the list above. He’s just that one step below them, alongside the likes of Vieira, Pires and Sol Campbell as foundation stones of the Invincibles, worthy of enormous respect and gratitude.

But a statue? Sorry Dennis, but we need to save them for the greatest of the great. And unfortunately, you were only great.

------------
If you’ve been having problems accessing this site on your work computer using the URLS globalgooners.com and gossip.globalgooners.com should sort that problem for you.

Get your free LadyArse app here for Android, BlackBerry and Windows phone [iPhone coming soon]

Get your free Arsenal wallpaper, Facebook covers and Twitter headers here

Share

About Stephen Bradley

Gooner and below-average blogger who writes what he thinks, but sometimes doesn't think as he writes. Very occasionally makes a sensible point though, so watch out for that. Can be found on Twitter rambling away under the username @bradley08.
  • Kevin Ward

    The ode to berkamp was exceptional but i fear you got it wrong with what separates Messi and Ronaldo somewhat. while i agree with Ronaldo that you expect the exceptional the same could be said about messi. What i think separates them the most is messi is very much a team player and is just as likley to beat a player with a clever one-two as he is dribbling around 3/4 players. All that makes for better football as a whole and far more aesthetically pleasing on the eye. Is it after all a team game and not a one man show. Something you get the impression Ronaldo thinks it is at times, well most of the time anyway.
    If you were to measure the 2 as individuals you may (here comes some sacraliege) argue Ronaldo is the better player. He’s quicker, stronger, more direct on the ball. his range is far greater interms of where his goals can come from.
    let the slagging off commence!!!!!!

  • Kevin Ward

    the comment below, i think. is proof that i’m still a little drunk………..should have taken the day off i think.

  • tschabal

    Think it’s very harsh on Dennis. When Bergkamp signed, he was joining the club in the prime of his career. He was a world talent, everyone knew who he was. Arsenal had a terrible season in 1994/95, they had no European football the following campaign and he still joined. Yes, Arsenal ‘rescued’ him from a bad spell in Milan, but there was no denying his talent. Bergkamp’s signing helped turn Arsenal into contenders within a few years. His presence at the club attracted other players to join (Overmars for example) and that’s a huge part of Wenger’s first double winning team right there. His signing helped transform Arsenal from mediocrity in the mid-90s to double winners a few years later. Bergkamp signs and Arsenal climb from 12th to 5th in a year. Yes, it’s not all Bergkamp, but it’s a massive help having a world class player on your books to help you out when times are tough.

    His goals were pure magic. He had you on the edge of your seat when you watched him. Worth the admission fee alone. You knew when he picked the ball up he would do something special with it. Not just scoring goals either. Assists. If Bergkamp wasn’t there providing assists, Arsenal would have missed out on a LOT of great goals during the golden era of the late 90s / early 2000′s. Thierry Henry is thankful he had Bergkamp with him, you can bet that!. His overall contribution to the cause was fantastic and like I mentioned above, was there when things were really bad and helped pick us up.

    Your point about Henry not getting a testimonial. Players get testimonials after 10 years at a club. Henry was at Arsenal from 1999 – 2007. He had a couple of months on loan so if we’re generous that’s 8 and a half years. I’m not saying he’s not worthy of it, but I thought you had to play a minimum of 10 years?. Plus if you add that he is still playing (as you mentioned) and left the club somewhat unexpectedly given that he had signed a new deal the previous summer, you can hardly blame Arsenal for not planning one, given in May 2007 they might well have been anticipating he stayed (he was in the 2007/08 away kit ads, so they probably thought he’d honour his contract).

    The point you make about Henry scoring a goal at the stadium was a strange one to me. Henry played 1 full season and a couple of months last season at the Emirates. He’s a striker, he was bound to score at the stadium. Bergkamp played just the ONE game at the Emirates, his testimonial. So what, he didn’t score at the Emirates, what do you wanna do, put the statue outside where Highbury was?!. He had retired the year that the stadium opened, Henry was still a Premier League striker, top scorer in the league in 05/06.

    Herbert Chapman was long gone by the time the Emirates was built and Tony Adams had been retired for 4 years, but their statues are still outside the Emirates.

    It’s fair to say that I respectfully disagree.

  • GonneRed

    Shocking article in my opinion (and yes I have been a fan for longer than the Bergkamp and Wenger years) he fully deserves his statue.

    Reasons why DB10 deserves his statue:

    1) He is the physical embodiment of the clubs new direction when he signed and our changed style of play from hard defending 1-0 merchants to free flowing football.

    2) Because of him other top foreign players wanted to come, not only to Arsenal but the premiership in general. He was the 1st major, in his prime, world class star to grace the premier league. Most others were untried or over the hill looking for a pay day.

    3) He loved Arsenal. People get all misty eyed about Henry, Vieira et el and I love them too but the truth is time and time again they were linked to moves away and they never quashed them. Bergkamp never was and was always loyal to Arsenal.

    4) The goals – 99% of his goals were incredible. He didn’t do simple.
    Some of his goals I don’t even think Henry could have pulled off.

    5) The vision – No Arsenal player bar Fabregas has ever had the speed of thought and eye for a pass that Bergkamp had.

    In fact I can’t even be bothered to go on.

    Watch a programme on ESPN classic, should be able to find it online. It’s called ‘Legends of the premier league – Dennis Bergkamp’

    If you still believe he doesn’t deserve his statue after watching that then nothing will change your mind.

  • JoePridmore

    I see where you’re coming from and you make a valid point, but the fact is that Bergkamp was one of the greatest players Arsenal, the Premier League and even the world has ever seen. When he joined Arsenal he was our first global superstar and one of the very first foreign players in the league and on top of that, as GonneRed said, he embodied a new direction for the club. The pragmatic, efficient Graham era was over and Arsenal was now ready to become a truly modern, stylish club not only playing but also winning beautifully. Not only were his goals, assists and overall play integral to the success of Wenger’s early teams, especially the Invincibles, but nearly every one was beautiful and added the flair and glamour that made Arsenal a truly great club and a truly memorable team. However, the clincher, in my opinion, is that he retired at the club. Henry and Viera, for all their legendary status, left the club early and forced their own exits, Bergkamp stuck it out and is one of the few Arsenal legends that lasted until the end. It’s the same with Adams; commitment like theirs should be acknowledged and rewarded.

    Having said that, I understand what you mean and think Brady at least should be considered, but just because others are worthy of recognition doesn’t mean Bergkamp isn’t. I’m also worried, as I sense you might be, that if we continue to make statues then their significance will be lost. Wenger will certainly be getting one when he leaves and its possible, although perhaps unlikely, that Viera and Pires as well as Graham and a few older players could also be in the running. A host of bronze statues would remove the prestige and, quite frankly, look a bit ridiculous and cluttered. However I don’t think like others that you having a different opinion makes this is a ‘bad’ article.

  • http://twitter.com/NolaGooner New Orleans Gooner

    You’re acting like this is the last statue they are ever gonna erect. Should Brady, McLintock, Mee, George, Wrighty, Rocky have statues ahead of Dennis? Arguably, yes. But just because he is a more recent legend, yes LEGEND, doesn’t mean he is a not deserving of the honour.

    The players/managers you mentioned above should get statues, I believe they will, in time. The Emirates covers a massive area and there is plenty of room to honour Arsenal greats.

    Bergkamp was consumate professional, technically brilliant, a one off in an Arsenal shirt. A player of unrivaled class who scored some marvelous goals, and plenty of them, Not to mention his assists. He was a integral part of all of Arsenal’s most recent success.

    So tell us again why he doesn’t deserve a statue, beside the childish notion that getting picked last hurts one’s feelings…

  • Stephen Bradley

    First of all, thanks for all the responses. I think the 2nd paragraph of JoePridmore’s response sums up my where I stand on this. This isn’t a criticism of Bergkamp the player, it’s more of a comment on where I personally see his place in Arsenal history, that’s all.
    Of course, it’s more than possible that the above article is me talking out of my backside. But if Dennis is to be recognised in this way, then I’d personally like to see us give that same honour to those worthy before Dennis came, as each statue erected dilutes the honour slightly, and despite the intention of not creating a pecking order, that’s the inevitable effect.

  • Pingback: Dennis Bergkamp statue to be unveiled

Categories

The LadyArse Team on Twitter